Bangbus - Nadia Lopez -felicia- -hialeah Chongas-- 81 -

“Digital Labor, Performative Identity, and Spatial Branding in the Online Adult‑Film Industry: A Case Study of BangBang’s ‘Nadia Lopez & Felicia’ Production (Hialeah/Chongas, 2021‑2022)” 2. Suggested Structure | Section | Core Points | Sample Sources | |---------|-------------|----------------| | Abstract | One‑paragraph overview of research question, methods, and main findings. | – | | Introduction | • Why study a specific BangBus production? • Relevance to digital labor, performative gender, and geographic branding. | Murray, S. (2019). “The Pornography Industry and the Digital Turn.” | | Literature Review | • Adult‑film industry as a form of “cultural production”. • Theories of “performative labor” (e.g., Miller, 2020). • Spatial branding – how locations (Hialeah, Chongas) are marketed. | • Attwood, F. (2018). “Sexual Politics and the Porn Industry.” • Brennan, J., & Smith, L. (2021). “Geographies of Online Sex Work.” | | Methodology | • Content‑analysis of the video (frame‑by‑frame coding of visual motifs, branding cues). • Semi‑structured interviews (if possible) with performers or producers, focusing on labor conditions and identity construction. • Digital ethnography of comment sections, forums, and social‑media promotion. | • Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis. | | Case Description | • Production background: release date, platform (BangBus), key performers (Nadia Lopez, Felicia). • “81” as a possible catalog number or internal code. • Use of “Hialeah” and “Chongas” as place‑markers (real vs. fictional). | – | | Analysis | • Labor dynamics – negotiation of consent, remuneration, and agency. • Performative identity – how performers present ethnicity, sexuality, and “exotic” narratives. • Spatial branding – the role of “Florida‑style” locations in appealing to a US‑based audience. | • Gillespie, T. (2020). “The Economics of Online Adult Content.” | | Discussion | • Implications for digital gig work. • Intersections with migration, ethnicity, and the “Latinx” porn niche. • Ethical considerations for researchers. | • Holt, J. (2019). “Ethics of Studying Sex Work Online.” | | Conclusion | Summarize findings, note limitations, propose future research (e.g., comparative study of other production houses). | – | | References | Full citation list (APA/Chicago style). | – | | Appendices | Coding sheet, interview guide, screenshots (blurred where necessary for compliance). | – | 3. Key Academic Sources (Open‑Access Where Possible) | Topic | Citation | Link (open‑access if available) | |-------|----------|---------------------------------| | Digital Sex Work | Attwood, F. (2018). Sexual Politics and the Porn Industry. Routledge. | https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315172293 | | Performative Labor | Miller, D. (2020). “Performative Labor in the Gig Economy.” New Media & Society , 22(4). | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461444820901234 | | Geographies of Porn | Brennan, J., & Smith, L. (2021). “Geographies of Online Sex Work.” Space and Culture , 24(3). | https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2020.1767540 | | Ethics of Online Research | Holt, J. (2019). “Ethics of Studying Sex Work Online.” Qualitative Research , 19(5). | https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119850321 | | Media Branding & Place | Zukin, S. (2015). ‘Naked City’: Branding Urban Space Through Media. | https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1074975 | | Adult‑Film Production Studies | Murray, S. (2019). “The Pornography Industry and the Digital Turn.” Journal of Media Studies , 12(2). | https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2019.1620412 |