The response to the oath is in verse 3: innaka lamina l-mursalīn .
Grammatically, Yā Sīn are ḥurūf muqaṭṭaʿah (disjointed letters). Scholars assign them maḥall jar because they are treated as proper names of the Sūrah. Some posit qasam (oath) with yā of address as a hypothetical majrūr . Nurul Yaqeen-detailed Grammatical Analysis Of Quran Pdf
The sentence huwa llāhu aḥad contains two grammatical possibilities: (a) huwa mubtadaʾ, allāhu khabar, aḥad naʿt; (b) huwa and allāhu both mubtadaʾ, aḥad khabar. Preferred view: aḥad is khabar and allāhu is badal from huwa . 3.3 Sūrat Yāsīn (36:1–4) – As cited in Nūr al-Yaqīn for Prophethood proofs Verse 1: Yā Sīn The response to the oath is in verse
| Word | Iʿrāb | |-------|-------| | Inna | Ḥarf naṣb (accusative particle) | | Ka | Suffixed pronoun, 2nd person masc. sing., fī maḥall naṣb as ism of inna | | La- | Lām of emphasis (lām al-tawkīd) – ḥarf | | Mina | Ḥarf jar | | Al-mursalīna | Ism, majrūr, but appears with yāʾ because it is sound masculine plural – in genitive, yāʾ replaces kasrah | Some posit qasam (oath) with yā of address
: In the account of the Miʿrāj, the author cites subḥāna lladhī asrā (17:1). He explains the accusative ʿabduhu as the object of asrā , and the preposition bi- in bi-ʿibādihi as redundant (zāʾidah) for emphasis – a grammatical feature common in Qur’anic style to indicate comprehensiveness. 5. Findings and Discussion | Grammatical Feature | Qur’anic Example | Function | |---------------------|------------------|----------| | Redundant bi- | Wa-kafā bi-llāhi shahīdan (4:79) | Emphasis of sufficiency | | Omission (ḥadhf) | Wa-layl (93:2) – predicate missing | Brevity and oath structure | | Accusative of specification (tamyīz) | Wa-fajjarā l-arḍa ʿuyūnan (36:34) | Clarifies quantity/type | | Conditional in with past verb | In jāʾaka fāsiq (49:6) | Realistic future condition |