In the end, the title is literal. You are under the witch. And the witch is under NumericGazer’s gaze. And NumericGazer, whoever they are, is watching you check the version number one more time, wondering what changed.
// Original intent: Witch affection = (obedience * 0.7) - (resistance attempts * 1.2) + (buildNumberDelta * 0.01) // Replaced with non-linear response curve to prevent grind optimization. -NumericGazer, 2024-11-03 The witch learns. Not narratively—numerically. If a player repeatedly selects the same “submissive” dialogue option, the witch’s response shifts from rewarding to punitive. The system detects and punishes metagaming. You cannot hack the witch because the witch is the hack.
The patch notes for tomorrow have not been written. But the witch already knows. Under the Witch -v2025-01-10- -NumericGazer-
I. Introduction: Beyond the Version Number In the sprawling ecosystem of indie adult-oriented interactive fiction, few titles have inspired as much quiet technical reverence and narrative unease as Under the Witch . The version string “v2025-01-10” and the enigmatic handle “NumericGazer” are not mere metadata; they are signatures of a specific philosophical and technical approach to game design. While mainstream discourse often fixates on the explicit content, a deeper excavation reveals a project obsessed with systems—of control, numerical representation, and the algorithmic gaze.
These are not features. They are logical extensions of the game’s core premise: that control is a function of information, and information is a function of time and attention. Under the Witch is not about a witch. It is about the architecture of submission—how a system of numbers, observed by an anonymous gaze, can produce the feeling of desire, fear, and dependency. In the end, the title is literal
This article dissects Under the Witch not as a game, but as a : a closed system where every relationship, every power dynamic, and every emotional beat is rendered legible through numbers, timestamps, and deterministic logic. NumericGazer, the presumed lead developer, has crafted a work that sits at the intersection of BDSM theory, early dungeon-crawler RPGs, and software versioning as an aesthetic statement. II. The Weight of the Date: v2025-01-10 as a Manifesto Conventional game versioning (1.0, 2.1) implies progress toward a finished state. The ISO date format—v2025-01-10—is different. It evokes logs, patch notes, continuous deployment. There is no “final version.” There is only the latest snapshot.
In v2025-01-10, a new “reflection” scene was added. If the player looks into a mirror in the witch’s chamber, the text reads: “You see yourself. But behind your reflection, faintly, digits scroll. Someone is watching the watcher. The witch smiles. She knew all along.” The fourth wall is not broken. It is quantified. What comes after v2025-01-10? NumericGazer’s roadmap (leaked via a datamined string table) includes “v2025-06-01” with a note: “Introduce asynchronous events based on system clock. The witch will know if you play at 3 AM.” Another: “v2026-01-01 – Remove ‘exit game’ function. Alt+F4 triggers a special scene.” And NumericGazer, whoever they are, is watching you
In v2025-01-10, dataminers discovered a commented-out block in the AI controller:
Absolute Linux will continue development under eXybit Technologies, built with the same approach and
structure we've used to develop RefreshOS. We're not here to reinvent what made Absolute great, we're here
to carry it forward.
Since 2007, Absolute has stood for being simple, pre-configured, and lightweight. Slackware made easy.
That core philosophy isn't changing. Absolute will always be free, open-source, built for ease of use,
and based on the Slackware foundation.
As of now, there is no set release date for the first eXybit-developed stable version of Absolute Linux. We're bringing Absolute into modern computing while keeping it minimal. The first step is to preserve what already exists, rebuild the underlying infrastructure, and create a canary version of the next major stable release.
You can still download the original versions of Absolute Linux by Paul Sherman on SourceForge.
